dockerfile java 17 examplehow to edit file in docker container
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 6:07 PM Max Rydahl Andersen <. But I guess my strong point here is. On Mon, 8 Nov 2021, 12:29 Thomas Qvarnstrom, <. We should support Java 17 that is fine, but there is a different betweensupporting it and defaulting to it. @aaron-prindle Thanks for providing a workaround. -- On 27 Oct 2021, at 11:51, Andy Damevin wrote: >>> fact that Java 17 is not yet available in the Red Hat packages catalog (it. - where to get java17 image for our current setup. this thread was all about making java 17 available. https://github.com/fabric8io-images/run-java-sh/blob/master/fish-pepper/run-java-sh/fp-files/run-java.sh On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 1:29 PM Thomas Qvarnstrom <. to your account, I would like to be able to select a Docker image of Skaffold, example: v1.35.2 with Java 17 JDK as there is a potential need to use the latest LTS version of Java for a project I'm working on. https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/skaffold/blob/main/deploy/skaffold/Dockerfile.deps#L154, https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/skaffold/blob/main/Makefile#L155-L162, https://storage.googleapis.com/skaffold/releases/latest/skaffold-linux-amd64, https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/skaffold/issues/new, Feature request: Offer gcr.io/k8s-skaffold/skaffold image with java 17 support. The image only works with JDK 11 currently. Sure; I understand that. is manually configured. From Clement feedback it seems it is very heavy. privacy statement. should we download the jdk manually and unzip it? Cell: +7(903)790-93-34 java 17 to become available with this option). -- Doesnt solve the initial challenge. Is there a reason why don't we abstract all the logic inside the project dockerfiles to our own quarkus base image? invalid builder aborkovac/skaffold-buildpack:java17: builder index.docker.io/aborkovac/skaffold-buildpack:java17 missing label io.buildpacks.builder.metadata -- try recreating builder. You could create your own image using gcr.io/k8s-skaffold/skaffold as a base image and install a Java 8 JDK and configure toolchains. To be honestthis worries me a bit. Not about making it the default. then use the Red Hat packages catalog to install the jdk and the dockerfile Yeah let's wait for java 17. I did try that but I probably stumbled on some beginner's problem (first time exploring skaffold). "Quarkus Development mailing list" group. Is there no desire to provide both a JDK 11 container image and JDK 17 container image as two separate choices? My personal favorite java images is bellsoft's jdk From the similar issue linked - #6012 the precendent here is that user's can build their own image that includes the JDK that is required for their use case (JDK 17 here). My worries is that if we start to default our tooling to Java 17 and generate project setups with example code that will not compile on Java 11. images (https://hub.docker.com/u/bellsoft). I believe there are some newer replacement of these which haven't been updated for a while but not actually sure where they are atm. https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/quarkus-dev/CAE_u_P56c8f9ZBZesnn-PmJOjVc%2BFRS5R-KATrhcsc1FDuLNfw%40mail.gmail.com. seems it is very heavy. We use this variant (base java image from bellsoft+run-java.sh) widely in @aaron-prindle Not really sure I understand this choice. docker build phase. https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/quarkus-dev/CAE_u_P56c8f9ZBZesnn-PmJOjVc%2BFRS5R-KATrhcsc1FDuLNfw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer On 4 Nov 2021, 13:25 +0100, Thomas Qvarnstrom <. I changed to openjdk-17 and run make release-build as you suggested but when I include this in my skaffold pipeline I'm getting this error. Also, using Instead of requiring a quarkus built image (of which we would need a different one based on what platform you target) I think biggest benefit would be we didnt have static generated Docker files but just generate them based on what build is happening. Whats your worry? Have we made a decision to default to Java 17 in our tooling? - should we download the jdk manually and unzip it? - should we wait for java 17 and keep the current system? Why even provide an image with any JDK at all? Many newer Maven plugins no longer work with JDK 8. Sergey Bezrukov Initially I'm at least fine with us generating Java 11 projects that users can change to Java 17. Have a question about this project? @calebdelnay sorry for the delay on the response here. If not, then when does the singular Skaffold image move from JDK 11 to JDK 17 as the default? for application start seems a good idea. Sign in You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quarkus Development mailing list" group. On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 9:49 AM Andy Damevin adam@redhat.com wrote: While making Java 17 available in our generated projects (#20849, https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/pull/20849 ), we stumbled upon the. Would it be possibly to have images made with Java 17 JDK? The latest release can be obtained from https://storage.googleapis.com/skaffold/releases/latest/skaffold-linux-amd64. If above error is unexpected, please open an issue to report this error at https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/skaffold/issues/new. whats special about those to make them favourites ? Currently, our containers are using raw ubi-minimal as base image and to Andy Damevin, Quarkus Development mailing list, to Sanne Grinovero, Quarkus Development mailing list, to Andy Damevin, Sanne Grinovero, Quarkus Development mailing list, to Max Rydahl Andersen, Sanne Grinovero, Quarkus Development mailing list, to Sergey Bezrukov, Quarkus Development mailing list, to Max Rydahl Andersen, Andy Damevin, Quarkus Development mailing list, to Andy Damevin, Thomas Qvarnstrom, Quarkus Development mailing list, to Thomas Qvarnstrom, Andy Damevin, Quarkus Development mailing list, to Thomas Qvarnstrom, Max Rydahl Andersen, Andy Damevin, Quarkus Development mailing list, https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/quarkus-dev/CAE_u_P56c8f9ZBZesnn-PmJOjVc%2BFRS5R-KATrhcsc1FDuLNfw%40mail.gmail.com, https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/pull/20849, https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/quarkus-dev/CAE_u_P56c8f9ZBZesnn-PmJOjVc%2BFRS5R-KATrhcsc1FDuLNfw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer, https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/quarkus-dev/CAE_u_P6q9A9omnFkHVvbW9R%2BaKLDHBztqgR-qfEnKXdCnAY-qA%40mail.gmail.com, https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/issues/21081, https://github.com/fabric8io-images/run-java-sh/blob/master/fish-pepper/run-java-sh/fp-files/run-java.sh, https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/quarkus-dev/CAD1V%3DtR%2BPX1WvzWomLaWKj0T0eVG-WqHa3QHmWZWgpkAPOtc1g%40mail.gmail.com, https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/quarkus-dev/12308B1B-131F-4CD9-8919-CE0CE14F658D%40redhat.com, https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/quarkus-dev/CAFPdrWidZE4yx234ZZ%3DrtiZXfbf8LdAmn418b_9sLtjsz9rJNA%40mail.gmail.com. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. To view this discussion on the web visit Currently we have no plan to migrate from JDK 11 to JDK 17 but I will bring this up at our next team meeting and see what are plans our there and add more information here. Here are some advantages of having our own base images that I see: - one base image for native, one base image for jvms, - ease of use (you just need to specify the java version and the put the jars/bins and maybe some inputs to customize a few things), - reduce processing (less operations in the dockerfile which is currently pretty dense and obscure), - less code to maintain in each new generated Quarkus projects, - we keep control over the content and in case of bug a simple update of the tag would fix the problem for all the consumer. should we use the ubi java image (I guess we will also have to wait for. - should we use the ubi java image (I guess we will also have to wait for java 17 to become available withthis option). Well occasionally send you account related emails. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/skaffold/blob/main/deploy/skaffold/Dockerfile.deps#L154. should we wait for java 17 and keep the current system? You signed in with another tab or window. This is my skaffold file (still work in progress btw). To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/quarkus-dev/CAD1V%3DtR%2BPX1WvzWomLaWKj0T0eVG-WqHa3QHmWZWgpkAPOtc1g%40mail.gmail.com. our Quarkus deployments and 100% happy with it. I normally don't recommend waiting, but 9th of November is IMO close enough. Isn't it actually a good thing to have demos and quickstarts to use the latest LTS? fact that Java 17 is not yet available in the Red Hat packages catalog (it email to quarkus-dev@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an I understand the desire to keep backwards compatibility, but that aspect can be taken care of by CI. Our gcr.io/k8s-skaffold/skaffold image is already too hefty. From Clement feedback it I created this issue for your suggestion: I think it will be great to get rid of any additional downloads during the docker build phase. My worries is that if we start to default our tooling to Java 17 and generate project setups with example code that will not compile on Java 11. . Just because we add Java 17 we cannot remove support for Java 11 and our tooling should either be able to handle both or if not possible, then it should default to 11. -- As a potential workaround in the short-term, you could build your own image from skaffold source modifying the line above and then using the release-build Makefile rule to build the image locally (https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/skaffold/blob/main/Makefile#L155-L162): I've added this issue for discussion in our team's weekly meeting, I will update the thread here to see if updating our image to JDK 17 or possibly adding an additional image might make sense here to support use cases like yours, Closing this as it is a duplicate of #6012. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups The suggestion there that resolved the issue was a user creating their own image - #6012 (comment). To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to quarkus-dev@googlegroups.com. Already on GitHub? Just being discussed we should have a way to make java 17 based images. You do not have permission to delete messages in this group, Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message, While making Java 17 available in our generated projects (. You could create your own image using your JDK of choice and install Skaffold there. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: The JDK 11 import comes from this line here in the skaffold image Dockerfile: Skype: sergey.bezrukov. My personal favorite java images is bellsoft's jdk images (. It needs to keep feeling new. MaybeI am missing something but it seems pretty appealingfrom where I stand.. should be added on November 9). On 1 Nov 2021, at 7:44, Sergey Bezrukov wrote: I think it will be great to get rid of any additional downloads during the
French Bulldog Vancouver, Irish Wolfhound Average Weight Kg, How Much Exercise Does A Bernese Mountain Dog Need, Teacup Pomeranian Puppies For Sale In Wisconsin, Maltipoo Puppies For Sale Hickory, Nc, Rat Terrier Chihuahua Mix Rescue Near London,